My former colleagues at swissinfo.ch the other day published an interview with Brad Birkenfeld, the whistleblower at Swiss bank UBS.

Birkenfeld is serving a sentence in the United States for his part in helping wealthy clients evade US taxes. He's also responsible for exposing business practices that cost UBS dearly and as many would argue, increased momentum on the crackdown against foreign financial institutions helping clients evade taxes.

Birkenfeld isn't happy. "It’s an injustice. I’m handling it as best as could be expected, considering that I’m the most famous whistleblower in the United States who’s uncovered the biggest tax fraud in the history of the country," he told swissinfo.ch in an exclusive interview.

So far he's been the only UBS employee punished for the bank's activities although Swiss-based advisors at UBS and other banks have recently been warned against foreign travel.

Perhaps it's too late for Birkenfeld, serving a 40-month-sentence, but the New York Time's DealBook reports hedge funds are exploring a way to profit off of whistleblowing.

The Birkenfeld interview is here. The DealBook blog entry is here.

Swiss time trial monster Fabian Cancellara is currently racing the Paris-Roubix classic. If he wins he'll follow in the illustrious footsteps of Josef Fischer, the first winner.

I've spent much of the day writing, editing and updating copy on the plane crash that killed Poland's president and other top leaders. The numbers have been a little iffy, ranging from 88 to over 130.

It seems we've settled on 96... or is that 97? Even Yahoo wasn't sure this afternoon.

Not yet. Switzerland says the EU will continue to assist in helping release Max Göldi, a businessman held in Libya since July 2008 and now serving a prison term for immigration violations. He and another Swiss were picked up after Geneva police arrested a son of Moammar Gaddafi.

So far the Swiss have apologised, made overtures about compensation and dropped a pan-European travel ban on top Libyan officials. It's been fruitless.

Experts I spoke with today say there's not much leverage. Göldi’s prison term is up in 12 weeks.

The whole story is here.

Really quickly... Gawker has awesome pictures of a bug approaching one metre long.

The Sun isn't my favourite British tabloid. That honour of course goes to the Daily Mail. But the Sun does have this excellent scoop on a Chinese farmer with a terrible problem.

And the Large Hadron Collider, that Geneva particle accelerator some people think will create an earth gobbling black hole, has reached full power. It's a story I've covered several times. The big day was today.

Next post? A story on Switzerland, the EU and Libya.

Pigs with wigs? Last week I appeared on WakeUp Sydney, which to state the obvious, is a morning show down under. The assignment: help explain why Swiss voters defeated a national referendum that would have appointed animal lawyers in each of the country's 26 cantons.

To be clear: it would have been lawyers for animals... as opposed to, you know.

In any case, it the idea was rejected by about 70 per cent of the population. That doesn't mean we're not animal lovers. People take their dogs everywhere. They're allowed everywhere. The Swiss also have quite strict rules for the keeping of fish and rodents.

Getting back to the story, I had arrived on Wednesday morning fresh off an overnight from Toronto. I appeared in the office a few hours later and was asked do the interview. I spent a couple of hours brushing up on comparative animal rights around the world.

We ended up talking about kangaroos, tuna and kayaks, elephants and hamsters for rent. Have a listen.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

I suppose being copied and pasted should be considered a compliment. Today in my Google News update, I happened upon an article in the Tripoli Post entitled "Swiss Irrationality Drags EU into Dispute with Friendly Libya".

This has all to do with the case of two Swiss businessmen who were picked up in Libya in July 2008 after Geneva police arrested a son of the colonel for beating hotel workers. That touched off a diplomatic storm between the two countries, basically because you don't mess with Moammar.

It also gave journalists in these parts a break from writing about cheese, chocolate and banks.

Curious, I clicked the link. Unsurprisingly, the top of the article read pro-Libya. I continued.

About ten paragraphs in, came this line:

There is a possibility that the negotiations to solve the dispute that entangled the rest of Europe will continue in Berlin on Friday.

Odd, I thought. I had used the "entangled" just a few days ago in one of my own pieces. And those negotiations were last Friday, not two days from today.

The further I read, the more I felt a sense of déjà vu. Hmmm, I mused. This writer is really improving in the bottom half of his piece. Really. Amazing. Prose. Strong finish, mate.

And then this:

A move by Switzerland to impose Europe-wide visa restrictions against nearly 200 prominent Libyans may have backfired, a Geneva-based expert tells swissinfo.ch.

Followed by:

The Swiss decision, made last autumn, was one of many salvos in a two-year bilateral dispute and sparked Tripoli to bar citizens of Schengen zone nations from entering the country.

Marcelo Kohen, a professor of international law at Geneva's Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, said that Bern chose the wrong strategy.

In late 2008, the Swiss ban would have produced few ramifications outside its own borders.

But since entering the 25-country Schengen Area, Switzerland and its neighbours have been able to restrict the ability of people from outside the area to move freely within it.

That's exactly what Switzerland did. The Libyans alleged to be on the Swiss list are still permitted to enter other Schengen countries but must apply for individual visas.

That of course, was lifted directly from a Q&A I did last week with a Geneva-based professor.

The original article is here. A follow-up, describing the reaction of the Swiss media is here.

It's been interesting reading some of the reports on Copenhagen that have come out from some of the world's leading media, particularly from the AP. At best they've been over-optimistic, at worst, talking points from the UN and the IPCC on the "last great hope".

For the record, the Copenhagen is the UN's 15th major climate conference. The previous 14 had accomplished nothing much.

The Guardian is now reporting that a leaked text has left the conference in shambles.

The UN Copenhagen climate talks are in disarray today after developing countries reacted furiously to leaked documents that show world leaders will next week be asked to sign an agreement that hands more power to rich countries and sidelines the UN's role in all future climate change negotiations.

Hands up if you're surprised.

On November 29, Swiss citizens voted to ban the construction of new minarets on mosques. The country has four mosques with relatively inauspicious spires.

As in other parts of Europe, the Swiss right found a symbol around which to rally opposition for what it, and apparently 57.5 per cent of voters, perceive to be a symbol of radical Islam.

Coverage from swissinfo.ch, The New York Times, LA Times,  Turkey's Hürriyet and The Jerusalem Post.

On Thursday, I took part in a discussion on the Kojo Nnamde Show on Washington, DC's NPR station, along with American University's John Esposito and Dalia Mogahed of the Gallup Center for Muslim Studies.

The conversation is here:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

A couple days ago I worked on a piece about the world cycling championships in Mendrisio, in canton Ticino.

Most of the piece was on Fabian Cancellara, a Swiss nicknamed "Spartacus" for his amazing power. He's excellent in the time trial and not too bad in regular road races.

One nagging little bit I wanted to touch on was doping . Both interview partners in the piece  - an Italian-speaking Swiss a colleague interviewed, as well as the head of the country's road cycling association - expressed zero confidence that professional road cyclists are clean, or that the sport's governing body is doing enough to prevent doping.

I posed the statement to the UCI, the governing body, asking for comment. That was  met with disdain, to be charitable, and apparently under the presupposition that the issue of doping in cycling had been dreamed up by yours truly and that concerns didn't actually exist.

Note to press officer: you catch more journalists with honey than with venomous rage and wild conspiracy accusations.

After a 30-minute conversation, the message was this (paraphrased): "Your questions are too stupid to comment on." Ironically, the doping issue would have taken up about three lines at the bottom of the piece.

The UCI does spend a significant amount of money on testing. But as I would learn, quantity doesn't necessarily translate into quality.

Added the spokesman: "The UCI and WADA [World anti-Doping Agency] have an excellent relationship." The UCI is suing WADA.

The piece is here.

© 2010 Justin Häne Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha