Politicians in Switzerland have recently concluded it would be a good idea to cut funding for swissinfo.ch, the successor to Swiss Radio International and the international service of the Swiss Broadcasting Corporation (SBC).

swissinfo.ch, an online multimedia news service, is also my former employer.

The decision is wrongheaded. swissinfo.ch is currently supported 50 percent by the SBC and 50 percent by the government. No international service? For a country that punches far above its own weight - home to the United Nations, some of the world's biggest banks and pharmaceutical companies - it seems like a very shortsighted proposition.

Over the past decade, funding for the SBC's international service has already been dramatically cut- from around CHF50 million to CHF26 million currently. The Swiss abroad, English-speakers in Switzerland and anybody with an interest in comprehensive coverage of Switzerland deserve better.

I'd encourage you to add your name to the petition to save swissinfo.ch.

Below is a letter I wrote in support:

It was with great dismay that I read of plans by Switzerland’s cabinet and parliament to cut funding for swissinfo, the international service of the Swiss Broadcasting Corporation, from 2012 on.

swissinfo and its predecessor organization, Swiss Radio International, have for decades played a formative and decisive role in projecting Switzerland’s image abroad. In a world in which the availability of information is proliferating rapidly, but in which the reliability and comprehensiveness of privately-owned news services becomes increasingly in jeopardy, the elimination of a robust international service for the Swiss Broadcasting Corporation is nothing short of wrongheaded.

I speak from a unique perspective. As a Swiss abroad, I have a strong interest in keeping up-to-date with news from my homeland. Major international news services report on Switzerland occasionally- perhaps on a hot button issue like bank scandals or the recent referendum to ban minarets. If that’s all that happened in our great country, there wouldn’t be a problem.

Fortunately, it’s not. I had the privilege of having been employed as a journalist in swissinfo’s English section between 2008 and 2010. Only swissinfo reported in nine languages, explaining clearly and coherently news and political events, sport and our country’s diverse culture. Only swissinfo reported on what the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation is doing to restore infrastructure in war-torn West Africa and to rebuild livelihoods in Bangladesh. Only swissinfo carried an exclusive interview with UBS whistleblower Bradley Birkenfeld and only notwithstanding Switzerland’s domestic media, which does not carry reports in English, Chinese, Arabic or Japanese, only swissinfo comprehensively explained the political and legal nuances surrounding banking secrecy.

The media landscape around the world is changing rapidly and at the same time, governments face enormous fiscal challenges. I am not unaware of this, nor are my former colleagues in Bern, Geneva, Lugano and Zurich. Governments are naturally seeking to save money. But this is the wrong place. Both public and private broadcasters are increasingly expanding their online operations. It’s the medium of the future.

What sense does it make to cut this service? Who benefits? Who loses?

Switzerland is a small country but it punches far above its own weight. It is an international centre of finance and business, attracting thousands of high-calibre foreign employees. We are home to some of the world’s biggest banks, pharmaceutical companies, particle accelerators and tennis players. Three of our cities are ranked among the top ten in the world to live. The beauty of our landscape is as renowned as our neutrality and our humanitarian traditions.

Rather than cutting swissinfo, Switzerland’s politicians ought to be making plans to expand the service- in particular the departments telling Switzerland’s stories in the world’s major languages. Imagine no BBC World, no Voice of America or no Deutsche Welle. What league should Switzerland be in?

I implore you to stand strongly with swissinfo, the Swiss abroad and anybody with an interest in our country, and to oppose the shortsighted decision to cut funding to the international service of Switzerland’s public broadcaster.

I've spent much of the day writing, editing and updating copy on the plane crash that killed Poland's president and other top leaders. The numbers have been a little iffy, ranging from 88 to over 130.

It seems we've settled on 96... or is that 97? Even Yahoo wasn't sure this afternoon.

We spent a couple hours in the studio in December recording some voice for swissinfo.ch's Android platform. I'm going to try to get the outtakes, which, believe it or not, are a bit hilarious. Stay tuned.

But in the mean time, check out the promo.

This is a piece from my November reportage to Bangladesh. After spending a couple of days in Sunamganj District in the north, I flew south, to the edge of the Sunderbans, a protected mangrove forest. and spent time with the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation visiting villages affected by Cyclone Aila.

Cyclones are nothing new to southern Bangladesh but villagers say that storms are coming more frequently and with increasing intensity. Switzerland's development agency has pioneered a program that provides villagers with cash grants to invest in business opportunities.

Lives have changed over the past couple decades here, along with the weather. Cyclones are breaking the embankments meant to protect villages and protect the rice paddies from salt water. Aila washed away shrimp and fish farms, and the increase in the water's saline content means that rice has become more difficult to grow.

Last week, I had a three-day stretch that went like this: Zurich to Toronto to London to Bahrain to Dhaka. Never mind Lebanon the week before.

Then two days in Dhaka, a short flight to Sunmanganj, in northern Bangladesh, three nights there and back to Dhaka. Waiting for a flight to Jessore, which will be my gateway to the magnificent Sundarbans, an enormous mangrove forest by the sea.

On Tuesday, it's back to Dhaka and the next day, back to Zurich via Bahrain and London.

It's the cool season here and the fields in northern Bangladesh are no longer flooded. In a couple of months, the monsoon's waters will have given way to endless stretches of brilliant green and much of the country's vast rural population will be harvesting their crops - then waiting for monsoon.

Bangladesh is one of the  countries most often mentioned as being vulnerable to shifts in climate. A one-metre rise in sea level threatens to wash away one-third of the population in the Sundarbans. But according to just about everybody, the people here have little leverage at the global climate negotiating table.

They're still flying about 80 people to Copenhagen and many senior climate bureaucrats have Copenhagen on their minds. But apart from making a moral case for rich countries and the dirty developing countries to cut their emissions, there's not much leverage.

Bangladesh is responsible for a very small percentage of the pollution that is affecting its climate.

And for some people I spoke with in the north of the country, changing weather patterns may not be so bad at all.

In Sunamganj, many are quite happy that there's a little less rain during monsoon and that the dry season lasts a little longer: more time to grow crops.

But for the most part, any evidence of climate change is more anecdotal than scientific. A senior UNDP official told me a few days ago that they're relying on the UN models. Let's hope (or perhaps not) they're right.

My first impression (and an opinion shared my everybody I've spoken with) is that climate change is not the most significant development challenge the people here are facing. At least in certain parts hugging the Indian border, they're more concerned about fortifying their raised villages and ensuring waves don't enter their houses and wash away their children.

They're building floating vegetable gardens, diversifying their crops and they spend roughly one-third their annual income raising the dirt their villages are built upon.

I'll probably have some more thoughts in the next week or so as I work on the three stories I have planned. Pictures to be uploaded too.

In August, I travelled to where Geneva meets France and had a look at the world's largest particle accelerator. The Large Hadron Collider started up last September and went temporarily out of service on September 19.

Collider "not going to become a white elephant"

September should have been a happy first anniversary for the physicists pulling subatomic secrets out of the Large Hadron Collider.

They have spent much of the past year repairing it instead. Buried on the outskirts of Geneva beneath Swiss and French soil rests the world's largest soon-to-be-working particle accelerator.

On Friday, the European Organization for Nuclear Research (Cern), the group that developed the LHC, said the repairs cost nearly SFr35 million ($34 million).

The machine, the most powerful of its kind, was designed to recreate the conditions of the universe at its earliest, most violent stage of infancy.

more...

I am sitting in the airport in Bern right now although I'll be posting this from Munich (I hope) or from Booooocharest.

Like a North American, I got to the airport extra early. It's really small but you can get a flight to most big European cities, including Paris, which is quite convenient. I'm sitting here waiting for security to open so that I can go through and sit down again.

I'm sitting with my suitcase and my camera case. It contains a pretty nice, professional camera with three lenses. Two are pretty big and will make me look like a pro when I run around taking pictures of things.

I changed my plans a little bit. Originally, I was going to spend all my time in Bucharest but then was advised against it since there are really two Romanias - the east side, which is Russian-influenced, full of Gypsies of course and that part borders Moldova at to the east and the Black Sea. 

Bulgaria is on the bottom and the Ukraine on top. Then, there's the western side of the country, separated by the Carpathian mountains. This side is much more Western, with a strong Austro-Hungarian influence. Serbia is on the bottom left corner.

The country has a very pro-American administration.

I had planned to take a train across to Timisoara but it didn't work out because it would have been eight hours each way, so my office booked a flight, which takes one hour and 15 minutes.

I have most of my interviews lined up and am meeting with a journalist with Romania's international service, a film director and son of one of the country's famous movie stars, and an IT specialist who has worked around the world for Credit Suisse, including in Switzerland. They're all in Bucharest and I still need to set up things in Timisoara, but it shouldn't be a problem.

I go to Timisoara on Friday early evening and fly back Sunday morning.

© 2010 Justin Häne Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha